Pricing
Human vs. AI workforce - Southeast Asia lenders
Benchmarks assume USD-denominated planning common for regional HQs in Singapore and Malaysia, with loaded compensation bands reflecting hub markets (Singapore, Bangkok, Jakarta, Manila) and growth corridors. Figures are illustrative-not a quote. Metering for agents and LLMs follows transparent patterns comparable to other enterprise agent platforms.
Illustrative savings band
~58-88%
Typical reduction in modeled variable labor when acquisition, credit operations, early arrears, and back-office workflows are automated-while keeping MAS, BSP, OJK, and local conduct requirements in the human-approved design.
Faster onboarding without linear headcount adds
Retail, SME, and digital lending onboarding still involve e-KYC, income verification, and CRM discipline. Agents accelerate straight-through steps; RMs stay on complex structures and policy exceptions.
Typical human benchmark (SEA)
- Sales and ops roles in Singapore and KL hubs often show $35K-$85K+ equivalent loaded packages; tier-2 cities lower but volume-heavy.
- Meaningful application progression still consumes 20-45+ minutes of human time once KYC and suitability steps are included.
- Multi-country ASEAN footprint duplicates policy training and audit sampling.
MAS, BSP, OJK, and Bank Negara emphasize fair dealing, AML, and documentation discipline-automation must embed those controls by design.
AI workforce + LendingIQ (illustrative)
- English and local-language journeys with immutable logs, consent capture, and LOS/core integration.
- Platform fee + metered workflows; LLM and messaging at contracted rates.
- Human gates for high-value corporate or cross-border structures.
Many SEA teams model USD per completed onboarding pack or per qualified SME file.
Example: retail / SME acquisition factory
~2,400 qualified applications/month; ~3.5 FTE of mixed sales-ops capacity.
Modeled human run-rate
~$38K-$52K/mo loaded labor (illustrative model)
Modeled AI + LendingIQ
~$6K-$14K/mo LendingIQ + LLM usage for comparable throughput (illustrative)
Typical savings vs model
Often ~65-84% vs. modeled human run-rate at this volume
How to read these numbers
- All figures are illustrative USD planning models for ASEAN contexts-not a binding quote. City tier, BPO mix, and incentive structures move loaded cost materially.
- Cross-border and Islamic finance windows may require separate agent configurations-scoped in commercial proposals.
- We align models to your entities, languages, and core systems in an AI audit.
Reference
Want numbers tied to your LOS, channels, and SLAs- We’ll calibrate human baselines and agent throughput in a short working session.
Book an AI auditBack to home